Many have already made premature declarations that the final seven years have started. Others say we are right at the door. Here’s why I don’t think that can be, just yet.
From our study, it seems most probable that the scripture intends to point to the region north of Israel as the location from which Daniel’s “litte horn”, the eschatological Antichrist will arise (Dan 7:8; 8:9; Dan 11:21).
Not only is he called “the Assyrian” in the eschatological typology of Isaiah and Micah (Isa 10:5-6, 24-17; 11:4; 14:25; 19:23; 30:31; 31:8; Mic 5:1-7), and Ezekiel’s Gog, the “chief prince” over the nations of the north (Eze 38:2-3, 15; 39:1, compare with Dan 10:13), but the evidence of Daniel’s prophecy suggests that he rises more particularly in the territory of the once massive Seleucid Empire in the pattern of Antiochus Epiphany IV of the 2nd century B.C.
If that kind of territorial specificity is intended, this would point to the general area of modern Syria, since unlike Antiochus, the coming prince begins as a “little horn”, who “becomes strong with a small people” (Dan 7:8; 8:9; 11:23), obviously a lesser power than any of the four successors of Alexander.On this basis, it has been long expected that someone would rise up from within that general territory towards the end of Hosea’s 2nd millennial day (Hos 5:15-16). For this reason, many were reasonably considering whether Jolani (aka Amed al Sharaa) might be the fulfillment of one who would stand up in the estate of Antiochus IV, the great eschatological prototype of the final AC.
Click below for more…